ChatGPT article: OpenAI’s chatbot computer programme ChatGPT has taken the internet by storm over the past few months.
Founded in December 2015 by Sam Altman and Elon Musk, among four other entrepreneurs, OpenAI operates with the mission “to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.”
Now the San Francisco-based behemoth is reportedly in discussions to raise capital at a US $30 billion valuation.
ChatGPT has garnered mass social interest for its display of complex knowledge and a candid ability to converse on an infinite number of topics. You can think of it like Google 2.0, a more intellectual and emotionally responsive search function that runs on AI.
Musk stepped down from the company’s board in February 2018 after a reported conflict-of-interest arose with Tesla’s pursuit of AI tech, although the billionaire mogul, who has been publicly wary of AI’s threat to humanity, later criticised the firms operations.
In the spirit of weekend experimentation, here at The Chainsaw we thought we’d put this robotic genius to the test. The words you see below have been automatically generated by an AI system, specifically OpenAI’s ChatGPT.
Can this technology truly be the future of the internet? And how will it impact Web3? AI, it’s over to you.
Disclaimer: This article has not been edited by a human, or indeed amended for punctual or contextual inaccuracies. All observations are exactly as received by the AI.
Prompt:
“Write a comprehensive 500-word article for Australian-based Web3 magazine thechainsaw.com on the potential future impact of artificial intelligence in the Web3 space.
Specifically, you should include why the global community of NFT artists and collectors could benefit from this technology, but also address potential concerns and drawbacks for its wide-spread adoption. Also, how will it impact human creativity, for better or for worse?
Where suitable, you can occasionally include analogies, witty language and light humour to clarify or amplify a statement.
Oh, and the last thing, don’t be biased.”
ChatGPT article
As the world becomes increasingly digitized, the potential future impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Web3 space is gaining more attention. While the global community of non-fungible token (NFT) artists and collectors could certainly benefit from the use of AI, it’s important to also consider the potential concerns and drawbacks of its widespread adoption.
One way that AI could benefit the NFT space is through the use of machine learning algorithms to assist with the creation and curation of digital art. These algorithms could help artists generate new ideas, or even create entire pieces of art on their own. For collectors, AI could be used to analyze and predict the value of different NFTs, helping them to make more informed purchasing decisions.
However, the use of AI in the art world is not without its concerns. One potential drawback is the fear that AI will eventually replace human artists altogether. While it’s true that AI has the potential to automate certain tasks, it’s important to remember that it can never fully replicate the creativity and uniqueness of the human mind. Additionally, the use of AI in the art world could exacerbate existing inequalities, as those with access to the technology may have a significant advantage over those who do not.
ChatGPT article
Another potential concern is the impact that AI could have on human creativity. Some argue that the use of AI could lead to a homogenization of art, as algorithms may be more likely to produce similar works. On the other hand, others believe that AI could actually enhance human creativity by providing new tools and inspiration for artists.
Ultimately, the future impact of AI in the Web3 space will depend on how it is used and regulated. It’s important for the global community to carefully consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks of AI, and to ensure that its adoption is fair and responsible.
In conclusion, while the use of AI in the NFT space could bring many benefits to artists and collectors, it’s important to also consider the potential concerns and drawbacks. The future impact of AI on human creativity is difficult to predict, but with careful thought and regulation, it has the potential to enhance the art world for the better.
Human Conclusion
That was painful reading. Technically and structurally rigid, no more substance than the words on the page. Effectively just copy and pasting the prompt and filling in the gaps. You’re speaking to an audience of humans here, damn it!
AI can “never fully replicate the creativity and uniqueness of the human mind.” Well, gee thanks a bunch.
Seriously though, while ChatGPT might be adept at writing vegan soup recipes and lines of computer code, it’s got some learning to do in terms of emotional capacity and cultural understanding before it can surpass human capabilities.
ChatGPT article: Conclusion? Yeah, nah.
